Well here we go.I finally figured out how to get the stupid pictures off my camera. For being a programmer, it was oddly hard, yet /facepalm easy. I lol'd.
Anyhow, here's the first vehicle I saw that made me think "I've been seeing this shit for years, for the love of GOD it's about time I complain to EVERYONE about it." Honestly it's not the first "car pic" I took with my phone (that will be the next post), but this one was the deciding factor for this site so I fitured it was best to post this first. It was taken on May 10th, 2009 (we have a few pictures to catch up on before this is "live" stuff).
WHAT THE HELL IS UP WITH THIS?!?!?!
Do you REALLY want me to believe this vehicle is off-road worthy? I've gone "4-wheelin" and I do not see HOW THE HECK THIS WOULD FIT ON ANY OFFROAD TRAIL. not even like the dirt road that takes you to a trailhead for a good hike!
LOOK AT IT.
How big are those tires? like what, 3 foot? 4 foot tall? (36-48") LOOK AT THE SPACE BETWEEN THE TOP OF THE TIRE AND THE BODY PANELS. besides the fact that the suspension has ZERO play before you tear the quarterpanels off, it's ENTIRELY TOO LARGE, and well, the axle is STILL ABOUT WHERE IT ALWAYS IS, RIGHT WHERE THE BOLTS MAKE THINGS HAPPEN.
tell me this goes offroad. TELL ME THIS GOES OFFROAD. I want to see it. PROVE IT TO ME. and don't just show me it on a dirt road. BS. I see this being an effective "go to the Lake" vehical. And well, my '71 Olds did that, many times over, with a shiton of peeps in it so well, you DO NOT NEED THAT SIZE OF A TRUCK. Seriously. Get a hotel room if you need to stroke your ego.
and honestly, don't even preach to me about the whole "who says you 'need' it" argument. it's obsurd and absolutely ineffective. you should thank your lucky stars your truck didn't fall over when you made that turn.
No comments:
Post a Comment